THE SYSTEM OF THE MANAGEMENT OF STABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES: COMPARISON OF THE NATIVE AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
Abstract
The article elucidates the problems and tendencies of formation of the native system of the management of the stable development of rural territories in the context of budgetary policy and general European experience.The author has systematized the types of state support of the stable development of the rural territories by the forms of budgetary regulation and their legislative support. The world experience of the state support of budgetary regulation of the development of rural territories and the features of the influence of state subventions on the economic safety of local territories were studied. The main problems and tendencies of the management of the stable development of rural territories were analyzed and the weak places – dependence of rural economy on agrarian production, decrease of effectiveness of existent resources usage and worsening of social-productive and ecological infrastructure of the villages were determined.
Alongside with it the inconsistency of the level of development of Ukrainian agrarian sector and rural territories in general to the world level and the standards of EU countries was revealed that is for today the significant obstacle on Ukraine’s way the to the membership in European Union. It can be explained especially by the general policy of development of the rural territories in European Union that is realized within the Common Agrarian Policy (CAP). Thus, on the way to the finish of administrative-territorial reform and decentralization of the power authorities Ukraine must take into account the priorities of CAP of EU countries as the target orientation points for the formation of the system of the management of stable development that would provide the balance of agricultural and rural development.
Taking into account the experience of development of EU agrarian policy, based on the domination of the development of rural territories over the other tasks, Ukraine must adapt its policy to the European standards and to follow the course of changes of agricultural development of EU countries for the timely modernization of the forms of state support of the stable development of rural territories.
Downloads
References
Zakon Ukrayiny 2982-IV. (2005). Pro osnovni zasady derzhavnoyi agrarnoyi polityky na period do 2015 roku. Available at: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2982-15
Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku silskyh terytorij Ukrayiny (na prykladi Karpatskogo regionu) (2011). Lviv: Instytut regionalnyh doslidzhen, 60.
Zalizko, V. D., Martynenkov, V. I. (2016). Sutnist innovacijnogo rozvytku ekonomiky silskyh terytorij. Ekonomika APK, 4, 66–74.
Shaptala, K. O. (2012). Vykorystannya yevropejskogo dosvidu rozvytku silskyh terytorij. Kultura narodov Prychernomorya, 229, 7–9.
Borshhevskyj, V. V. (2012). Rozvytok silskyh terytorij v systemi yevrointegracijnyh priorytetiv Ukrayiny. Lviv: NAN Ukrayiny, 216.
Osnovni priorytety Spilnoyi agrarnoyi polityky (SAP) krayin YeS. Agrarian Markets Development Institute. Available at: http://www.amdi.org.ua/uk/home/amdi-news/21-news/300-the-main-priorities-of-the-common-agricultural-policy-cap-of-the-eu.html
Ulyanchenko, Yu. (2007). Derzhavne regulyuvannya agrarnogo rynku v krayinax YeS i SShA: dosvid dlya Ukrayiny. Derzhavne budivnycztvo, 7. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2007_2_56
Stelmashhuk, A. M. (2000). Derzhavne regulyuvannya ekonomiky. Ternopil: TANG, 315.
Burja. V., Moraru, C., Rusu, O. (2008), Sustainable development of the Romanian rural areas. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 2, 645–650.
Gogol, T. V. (2012). Stanovlennya Spilnoyi agrarnoyi polityky Yevropejskogo Soyuzu ta regulyuvannya rozvytku silskyx terytorij. Derzhavne upravlinnya: teoriya ta praktyka, 1. Available at: http://www.academy.gov.ua/ej/ej15/txts/12GTVRST.pdf
Popova, O. L. (2012). Stalyj rozvytok agrosfery Ukrayiny: polityka i mehanizmy. Kyiv: NAN Ukrayiny, 352.
Gubeni, Yu. (2007). Rozvytok silskyh terytorij: deyaki aspekty yevropejskoyi teoriyi i praktyky. Ekonomika Ukrayiny, 4, 62–70.
Zalizko, V. D., Martynenkov, V. I. (2016). Teoretyko-metodologichni aspekty formuvannya strategiyi rozvytku silskyh terytorij Ukrayiny. Akademichnyj oglyad, 1, 101–110.
Oficijne internet-predstavnycztvo Prezydenta Ukrayiny. Available at: http://www.president.gov.ua/
Zalizko, V. D. (2014). Socialna bezpeka silskyh terytorij: problemy ta perspektyvy. Agrosvit, 11, 21–27.
Shkaratan, O. Y., Karacharovskyj, V. V., Gasyukova, E. N. (2015). Prekaryat: teoryya y empyrycheskyj analyz (na materyalah oprosov v Rossyy, 1994–2013). Socyologycheskye yssledovanyya, 12, 99–110
Mansel, J., Heitmeyer, W. (2010). Precarity, Segregation, and Poverty in the Social Space. Overview of the Research Status. Available at: https://difu.de/publikationen/precarity-segregation-and-poverty-in-the-social-space.html
Copyright (c) 2016 Irina Lutsenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.