FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CONJUGATED SYNTAGMAS

  • Mustafa Turmush Caucasian University, Azerbaijan
Keywords: conjunctive connection, sentence (phrase), incomplete proposition, conjugated part, syntagmatic segmentation of speech

Abstract

There is the close correlation between conjugation and syntagmatic segmentation of speech expressed in cer-tain syntagma typicality. The conjugated syntagma in live Russian speech and language of piece of art are identical on its structural-grammatical models. In the article is carried out an analysis of syntagmatic peculiarities of few Tur-kic languages, syntagma structures, its spontaneity, its additional functions, universal peculiarities of speech, possi-bility of syntagmatic segmentations; there was defined that all these peculiarities are more typical for informal lan-guage. At the same time there are specified the lexical and grammatical means at determination of the role of syn-tagma in speech sections conjunction. Among these means it is very important to consider the role of intonation and conjunctive means (prepositions, addresses and so on). The character of intonation-semantic unity in Turkic lan-guages somewhat differs from the other language groups including Slavic or Romanic-Germanic ones. This is ex-pressed in fact that syntagmas conjugated to the main structural-grammatical part of sentence are typified. The modern language processes that are represented first of all in formation of bilingualism have an influence on substantial syntagmas characteristics including Turkic languages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mustafa Turmush, Caucasian University
Department of languages

References

Axmanova, O. S. (2007). Slovar lingvisticheskix terminov. Moscow: KomKniga, 2007.

Sorokoletova, N. Yu. (2009). Intonacionnye osobennosti finalnyx sintagm v territorialnyx variantax sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka. Vestnik BomGU, seriya 2, Yazykoznanie, № 2.

Shherba, L. V. (1928). O chastyax rechi v russkom yazyke. V sb.: Russkaya rech. YY novaya seriya. Lvov.

Vinogradov, V. (1936). Stil «Pikovoj damy». V sb.: Vremennik Pushkinskoj komissii, 2. Izd-vo AN SSSR.

Xatiashvili, L. G. (1963). Prisoedinitelnye svyazi v russkom yazyke. Tbilisi.

Velichuk, A. P. (1960). O specifike prisoedinitelnoj svyazi v sovremennom russkom yazyke. (So-chinenie i prisoedinenie). AKD, Baku.

Kobzev, V. P. (1987). Nepolnye predlozheniya prisoedinitelnogo tipa v sovremennom russkom litera-turnom yazyke. AKD, Leningrad, 1966; Kudimova V. N. Strukturno-semanticheskaya sootnositelnost polnyx i nepolnyx predlozhenij v sovremennom russkom yazyke. AKD, Kiev, 1980; Kyazimov I. B. Nepolnoe pred-lozhenie v tyurkskix yazykax oguzskoj gruppy. AKD, Baku.

Zyakiev, M. Z. (1974). Xyazerge tatar yadyabi tele. Sintaksis. Kazan, Tatarstan kitap nyashrijjaty.

Shherba, L. V. (1963). Fonetika francuzskogo yazyka. Moscow.

Bulanin, L. L. (1970). Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka, Moscow.


👁 593
⬇ 111
Published
2016-01-31
How to Cite
Turmush, M. (2016). FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CONJUGATED SYNTAGMAS. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (1), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2016.00032
Section
Philology