CONVENTIONALISM AS A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF ECONOMIC SECURITY IN THE ENTERPRISE

Yuriy Pogorelov, Evhen Ivchenko

Abstract


The existence of different approaches for the understanding of the concept of economic security, taking into account its nominal nature as an economic and general scientific denotation, is actually, from the epistemological point of view, the basis for the application of conventionalism for explanation of the nature of the enterprise economic security, harmonization of such approaches and the links between them. It is shown, that nowadays the concept of economic security has a significant number of approaches for its interpretation.
The purpose of the article is to study theoretical approaches to understanding the economic security of the enterprise and the formation of a certain unified theoretical and methodological basis for understanding the economic security of the enterprise.
The methodological basis of the study, the results of which are presented in the article, is a set of methods of scientific research, general methods, techniques and principles, including comparison, monographic analysis, historical analysis, analysis and synthesis, abstract-logical analysis, classification, and systematization have been used.
It is shown, that nowadays the concept of economic security has a significant number of approaches for its interpretation. The correlation between such approaches can be considered either based on the shift of scientific paradigm (scientific revolution) by T. Kuhn [1] from the imperative to the synthetic approach, or based on the approach of the competition of scientific research programs by I. Lakatos [2] “security-development” and “security-safety”. Each approach creates the preconditions for the formation of the understanding of economic security, which in the future serves as the basis for the development of the tools for its evaluation, provision and enhancement.

Keywords


conventionalism; economic security; competition; enterprise; economic system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kuhn T. (2001). Struktura nauchnyih revolyutsiy. Moscow: AST, 15.

Lakatos, I. (1995). Falsifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatelskih programm. Moscow: Medium, 236.

Ianioglo, A., Polajeva, T. (2016 ). Origin and definition of the category of economic security of enterprise: a review. 9th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2016”. doi: 10.3846/bm.2016.46

Mutchler, J. E., Shih, Y., Lyu, J., Bruce, E. A., Gottlieb, A. (2014). The elder economic security standard index™: A new indicator for evaluating economic security in later life. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0577-y

Vasiltsev, T. G. (2008). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemnytstva Ukrainy: stratehiia ta mehanizmy zmitsnennia. Lviv: Aral, 384.

Linnik, O. I., Artemenko, N. V. (2013). Stratehiia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva yak faktor zmenshennia vplivu zovnishnih ta vnutrishnih zahroz. Visnyk of the NTU "KhPI", Kharkiv, 67 (1040). 159–169.

Vlasyuk, O. S. (2008). Teoriia i praktyka ekonomichnoi bezpeky v systemi nauky pro ekonomiku. Kyiv: RAND National Security Research Institute of Ukraine, 43–46.

Ilyashenko, O. V. (2016). Mehanizmy systemy ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Kharkiv: Machulin, 503.

Pogorelov, Yu. S., Vakhlakov, V. V. (2016). Peredumovy formuvannia konvergentno-prahmatychnoho pidhodu do rozuminnia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. European cooperation, 5 (12).

Ovcharenko, Ye. I. (2015). Systema ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryieemstva: formuvannia ta tsilepokladannia. Lisichansk: PromEnergo, 483.

Lyashenko, O. M. (2011). Kontseptualizatsiia upravlinnia ekonomichnoiu bezpekoiu pidpriemstva. EkonomIchna bezpeka pidpriemnitstva Ukraini: strategiya ta mehanizmi zmitsnennya.

Kozachenko, G. V., Adamenko, T. M. (2015). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemstva: analiz naiavnyh vyznachen. Visnyk of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, 1 (69), 90–95.

Zubok, M. I., Rubtsov, V. S., Yaremenko, S. M., Gusarov, V. G. (2012). Ekonomichna bezpeka subiektiv pidpryiemnytstva. Kyiv, 226.

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

Reale, J., Antiseri, D. (2003). Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashih dney. Ot romantizma do nashih dney. St. Petersburg: Pnevma, 880.

Poincaré, A. (1990). O nauke. Moscow: Nauka,

Uspenskiy, V. A. (1982). Teorema Giodelia o nepolnote. Moscow: Nauka, 110.

Gumenyuk, A. M. (2014). Bezpeka strukturno-instytutsionalnoi transformatsii ekonomiky rehionu: teoretychni osnovy ta prykladni aspekty. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies (NISS), 468.

Pogorelov, Yu. S. (2009). Modeliuvannia rozvytku pidpryiemstva. Current problems of the economy, 10 (100), 51–59.

Moiseenko, I. P., Marchenko. O. M. (2011). Upravlinnia finansovo-ekonomichnoiu bezpekoiu pidpryiemstva. Lviv, 380.

Poltorak, A., Volosyuk, Yu. (2016). Tax risks estimation in the system of enterprises economic security. Economic Annals-XXI, 158, 3-4(2), 35–38. doi: 10.21003/ea.V158-08

Kavun, S. V. (2009). Systema ekonomichnoi bezpeky: metodolohichni ta metodychni zasady. Kharkiv, 300.

Pogorelov, Yu. S. (2010). Pryroda, rushiini syly ta sposoby rozvytku pidpryiemstva. Kharkiv: AdvATM, 352.

Prus, N. V. (2014). Systema ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva: poniattia, sutnist, pryntsypy. Global and national problems of the economy, 675–679. Available at: http://www.global-national.in.ua/archive/2-2014/138.pdf

Semenenko, I. (2016). Energy Security of Ukraine in the Context of Its Sustainable Development. Equilibrium, 11(3), 537–555. doi: 10.12775/EQUIL.2016.024

Shulzhenko, L. E. (2014). Ekonomichna bezpeka stratehichnoho aliansu. Lugansk: Promotruk, 318.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2017.00463



Copyright (c) 2017 Evhen Ivchenko, Yuriy Pogorelov

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2504-5571 (Online), ISSN 2504-5563 (Print)