THE EDUCATION QUALITY MEASURING: AMERICAN EXPERIENCE
Abstract
This article focuses on the measurement of education quality and accreditation of Higher Learning Institutions in the USA; the analysis of educational activities of American universities; the coverage of accreditation and education performance of Higher Learning Institutions in the United States; these indicators usage in the process of education quality assessing in American universities; the essence disclosure of measurement the education quality with helping "added value" on the basis by American scientists research; the borrowing American experience into the Higher Learning Institutions in Ukraine.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Eaton, S. (2015). Jud. Accreditation. An overview of US Accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). Washington. Available at: https://www.chea.org/userfiles/uploads/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%202015.pdf
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). Washigton. Data Views 12.06.2017. http://www.chea.org/
Birnbaum, R. (1994). The Quality Cube: How College Presidents Assess Excellence. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 16 (1), 69–79. doi: 10.1080/1036970940160106
Kalinina, O. G. (2015). System of education quality management at Higher Educational Institutions of the United States. Luhansk: Luhansk National Taras Shevchenko Pedagogical University, 21.
Zvarych, I. M. (2014). Teachers’ professional activity evaluation at Higher Learning Institutions of the USA (the second half of the XX-th – beginning of the XXI-st century). Kyiv: Phenix, 344.
Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 288.
Green, D. M. (1994). Society for Research into Higher Education: What is quality in higher education? London, 132.
Melnychuk, O. S. (1977). Dictionary of foreign words. Kyiv: Main Office of Ukrainian Soviet. Encyclopedia, 776.
Saukh, P. Yu. (2011). Innovations of higher education: problems, experience, perspectives. Zhytomyr: Publishing house ZSU named after I. Franko, 443.
Dokuchaeva, V. V. (2007). Theoretical and methodological principles of designing innovative pedagogical systems. Luhansk: Luhansk National Taras Shevchenko Pedagogical University, 44.
Melnychuk, D. O. (2012). The education process organization of research type Universities. Kyiv: Publishing Center of NUBiP, 612.
Terentyeva, N. O. (2016). Intersubjective as the basis of a new knowledgeable product in the information society. Pedagogics and Psychology: Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1 (90), 59–65.
Yaroshenko, O. G., Skyba, Yu. A. (2016). Practice state of student research at universities. Pedagogics and Psychology: Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1 (90), 32–40.
On Higher Education (2014). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, No. 1556-VII. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2018.00536
Copyright (c) 2018 Iryna Zvarych, Alla Marushkevych

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 2504-5571 (Online), ISSN 2504-5563 (Print)