PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF CONFLICT IN THE SYSTEM OF MODERN RELATIONS BETWEEN RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS
Abstract
There were analyzed the causes and conditions of psychological incompatibility of Russians and Ukrainians, factors that influence installation of rejection and non-acceptance. There were accented the motivational aspects of life activity, interests, social sets and value orientations of Russians and Ukrainians, that are the most relevant constructs of their psychological incompatibility. There was considered the role of television as the most effective mass media that form the “enemy image” in the consciousness of audience, the uncompromising sets of idiosyncrasy character. There was determined that individuals with the low level of critical thinking and imagination that does not draw the distinct outlines are more subjected to the destructive influence of TV-hypnosis.
There is stated that the measured information policy, where the cognitive and rational phenomena act as articulated aspects, is the effective instrument of preventing the appearance of psychological state of rejection and non-acceptance in the relations between Russians and Ukrainians.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Livingstone, A. S. Haslam, A. (2008). The importance of social identity content in a setting of chronic social conflict: Understanding intergroup relations in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47 (1), 1–21. doi: 10.1348/014466607X200419
Cehajic, S., Brown, R., Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and Forget? Antecedents and Consequences of Intergroup Forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29 (3), 351–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00634.x
Enikeev, M. I. (2008). Psichologicheskiy enciklopedicheskiy slovar. Moscow: Prospekt, 560.
Jonsson, O., Seely, R. (2015). Russian Full-Spectrum Conflict: An Appraisal After Ukraine. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 28, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/13518046.2015.998118
Maslow, A. (2007). Motivation and personality. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 352.
Mole, J. (2006). Osobennosti nacionalnoy psichologii narodov novoy Evropy: biznes, obschenie, uspex. Moscow: Astel, 381.
Magun, V., Rudnev, M. (2013). Basic Human Values of Russians: Both Different from and Similar to Other Europeans. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2317178
Kisarchuk, Z. G., Grebin, L. O., Gurleva, T. S. (2012). Siciokulturni chinniki stanovlennya suchasnoy paradigmy psichoterapevticheskoy dopomogi osobistosty. Kirovograd: Imeks-LTD, 276.
Bogdanov, E., Zazikin, V. (2003). Psichologicheskie osnovy «Pablik rileshnz». Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 208.
Solzenicin, A. I. (1998). Rossiya v obvale. Moscow: Russkiy put, 206.
Harkavets, S. O. (2010). Socialno-normativniy konformizm osobistosti u psychologichnomu vimiri. Lugansk: Noulidg, 343.
Taras, R. C., Rajat, G. (2015). Understanding Ethnic Conflict. Routledge, 336.
Bogdanov, E. N., Zazikin, V. G. (2004). Psychologuya personality v konflikte. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 224.
Harkavets, S. A., Yakovenko, S. I. (2014). Obida i ee instalyaciya v kontekste rossiysko-ukraiskix otnosheniy. Fundamentalnie i prikladnye issledovaniya v praktikax veduchix nauchnyx shkol. Available at: http://fund-issled-intern.esrae.ru/4-47
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2016.00066
Copyright (c) 2016 Serhey Harkavets

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 2504-5571 (Online), ISSN 2504-5563 (Print)