GENERALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL INTERACTION IN PRODUCTION
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Besomi, D. (1999). Harrod on the classification of technological progress. The origin of a wild-goose chase. BNL Quarterly Review, 208, 95–118. Available at: http://economia.unipv.it/harrod/sec-lit/besomi/bnlqr99.pdf
Rozin, V. M. (2016). Tekhnika i tekhnologiya: ot kamennykh orudiy do Interneta i robotov. Yoshkar-Ola: Povolzhskiy gosudarstvennyi tekhnologicheskiy universitet, 280.
Rozin, V. M. (2012). Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'. Filosofskiye razlicheniya i kontseptsii. Moscow: Librokom, 304.
Mironov, A. V. (2006). Nauka, tekhnika i tekhnologii: tekhnoeticheskiy aspekt. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriia: Filosofiia, 1, 26–41.
Snitko, D. Y. (2016). Metaphisical background of technology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 90–99. doi: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87309
Tidwell, A. S. D., Smith, J. M. (2015). Morals, Materials, and Technoscience. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40 (5), 687–711. doi: 10.1177/0162243915577632
Knyazev, V. N. (1990). Chelovek i tekhnologiya (sotsial'no-filosofskiy aspekt). Kyiv: Lybid, 175.
Kutyrev, V. A. (2001). Kultura i tekhnologiya: borba mirov. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 240.
Gorokhov, V. G. (2009). Tekhnika i kul'tura. Vozniknovenie filosofii tekhniki i teorii tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva v Rossii i Germanii v kontse XIX – nachale XX stoletiya [Technology and culture: the emergence of the philosophy of technology and the theory of technical creativity in Russia and Germany in the late XIX – early XX Century]. Moscow: Logos, 376.
Gorokhov, V. G. (2009). Genezis tekhnicheskoy deyatel'nosti kak predmet sotsiologicheskogo analiza [The genesis of technical activities as the subject of sociological analysis]. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu "Filosofskie nauki" [Supplement to journal "Philosophical Sciences"]. Moscow: Gumanitary, 46.
Bagdasaryan, N. G. (Ed.). (2000). Dinamika texnocfery: cotsiokyl'typnyi kontekct [The dynamics of the technosphere: the sociocultural context]. Moscow: Bauman MSTU Publications, 198.
Mamford, L. (2001). Mif mashiny. Tekhnika i razvitiye chelovechestva. Moscow: Logos, 416. Available at: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3115
Neysbit, D. (2005). Vysokaya tekhnologiya, glubokaya gumannost': Tekhnologii i nashi poiski smysla. Moscow: AST: Tranzitkniga, 381.
Gorokhov, V. G. (2012). Tekhnicheskie nauki: istoriya i teoriya (istoriya nauki s filosofskoy tochki zreniya) [Technical sciences: History and theory (the history of science from the point of view of philosophy)]. Moscow: Logos, 512.
Ivanov, B. I., Cheshev, V. V. (2010). Stanovleniye i razvitiye tekhnicheskikh nauk [The emergence and development of technical sciences]. Moscow: URSS, 264.
Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter. Dordrecht: Springer Publ., 280. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-3940-6
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1 The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 316.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2613-5647.2018.00622
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Iryna Muratova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 2613-5647 (Online), ISSN 2613-5639 (Print)