UKRAINIAN VERSIONS OF CLASSIC PLOTS AND CHARACTERS: ANENT THE QUESTION OF THE EUROPEAN CANON

Olga Teterina

Abstract


The article focuses on the interpretation by Y. Boyko-Blokhin, Ukrainian emigre literary critic, of Ukrainian versions of traditional plots and characters, his thoughts are actualized with reflections of other researchers about the problem of European identity, and in particular with a variety of views on the European cultural heritage. An approach of the Ukrainian scholar to investigation of the outlined problem (with special attention to peculiarities of the national literature, and an emphasis on clarifying "mechanisms" of creative transformation of traditional material) is conceptualized from the perspective of the literary studies of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century. Arguments of the scholar concerning authenticity of Ukrainian versions of traditional characters, namely Prometheus (T. Shevchenko "The Caucasus"), Cain (I. Franko "The Death of Cain") and Don Juan (Lesia Ukrainka "The Stone Host"), are analyzed and comprehended in the European context, with due consideration for previous tradition, from the standpoint of the problem of style. Conclusions of the scholar are construed as representational for Ukrainian literature as an integral part of the European cultural space. An important role of conceptual ideas of the scholar, which remain relevant even for contemporary comparative literature studies, not only by contributing to continuous development of national comparative literature (given the impossibility of their full-fledged progress throughout several decades under the ideological pressure), but also regarding the forthcoming of "reformatting" of the global Slavic studies, is substantiated in view of the question of searching for the European canon.


Keywords


traditional plots and characters; archetype; Slavic literatures; European context; Romanticism; national identity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Toudoire-Surlapierre, F. (2013). Notre besoin de comparaison. Orizons, 187.

Pakhsaryan, N. T. (2016). University literary history course and the present: to a problem of general and comparative literatures history interrelation. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University, Dnipropetrovsk. Series "Philological Sciences", 2 (12), 25–31.

Fomina, G., Niamtsu, A. (2009). Myth and legend in global cultural space. Kyiv: Ruta, 262.

Koloshuk, N. (2018). Comparative literature studies. Kyiv: KONDOR, 422.

Budny, V., Ilnytsky, M. (2008). Comparative literary studies. Kyiv: “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” Publishing House, 430.

Brunel, P. (Ed.) (2016). Sompanion to Literary Myths, Heroes and Archetypes. New York, 1222.

Eliade, M. (2010). Aspects of the myth. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 251.

Toporov, V. N. (2010). World tree: universal sign complexes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Handwritten monuments of ancient Russia, 448.

Niamtsu, A. (2003). Fundamentals of the theory of traditional plots. Chernivtsi: Ruta, 80.

Hall, J. (2004). Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art. Moscow: Tranzitkniga, 655.

Corbeau-Parsons, C. (2013). Prometheus in the Nineteenth Century: From Myth to Symbol. Oxford: Legenda, 206.

Jung, C. G.; Zubrytska, M. (Ed.) (1996). Psychology and Poetry. Word. Sign. Discourse. Anthology of the world literary-critical thought of the 20th century. Lviv: Litopys, 91–108.

Boyko, Y. (1992). Creative heritage of Taras Shevchenko against the background of West European literature. Yuriy Boyko. Selected works. Kyiv: Medekol, 11–73.

Boyko, Y. (1992). Revisiting the problem of evolution of Franko's style. Yuriy Boyko. Selected works. Kyiv: Medekol, 94–109.

Volkov, A.; Gromyak, R. (Ed.) (2002). Traditional plots and characters. Literary comparative studies. Ternopil: Editorial and publishing department, TDPU, 181–216.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1975). Questions of literature and aesthetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 508.

Boyko, Y. (1981). “The Stone Host” by L. Ukrainka. Yuriy Boyko. Selected works. Vol. 3. Munich, 327–362.

Niamtsu, A.; Gromyak, R. (Ed.) (2002). Character of Don Juan in world literature: moral and psychological antinomies of behavioral and axiological complexes. Literary comparative studies. Ternopil: Editorial and publishing department, TDPU, 228–237.

Pogrebnaya, Y. V. (2016). Typology of interpretations of the Don Juan character. Questions of literature. Part 1.Tambov: Gramota, 9 (63), 41–45.

Böhmig, M. (2007). Between multilingualism and multiculturalism: in search of a European canon. NLO, 85. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2007/85/be19.html

Pachlovska, O. (2013). Taras Shevchenko – writer of the 21st century. Den, 87-88. Available at: https://day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/cuspilstvo/taras-shevchenko-pismennik-hhi-stolittya1

Сassidy, C. (2013). Review (Corbeau-Parsons C. Prometheus in the Nineteenth Century: From Myth to Symbol. Oxford: Legenda, 206. Available at: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/ccs.2018.0266

Chyzhevsky, D. (2005). Introduction / Comparative history of Slavic literatures. Kyiv: “Academia” Publishing Center”, 29–48.

Тeterina, O. (2018). Magnificent edifice of the history of Slavic literatures: Y. Boyko-Blokhin’s “Project“. EUREKA: Social and Humanities”, 6, 49–56.

Blokhin, D. (2017). Epistolary heritage of Yuriy Boyko-Blokhin. Munich-Ternopil, 602.

Dziuba, I. (2013). On three continents. Book 1. Kyiv: “KLIO” Publishers, 807.

Halych, O. A. (2013). Literary studies in Ukrainian emigration and diaspora. History of Literary Studies. Kyiv: Lybid, 274–292.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2613-5647.2019.00908

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Olga Teterina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2613-5647 (Online), ISSN 2613-5639 (Print)