List and characteristics of the main development strategies

Oleksandra Kononova, Yuliia Prymush


There is widespread the agreement among scientists that development is a multidimensional phenomenon, with economic, political, and social aspects, and that the different dimensions of development are interconnected with one another in complex ways. The fact that these different dimensions exert causal influences on one another would suggest that policymakers, dealing with issues of national development need to integrate economic, political, and social approaches, and to think strategically about how to achieve their goals.

Strategic thinking implies prioritization and sequencing, seeking to do first that is necessary or helpful to achieve later goals.

A strategy begins by defining a clear objective, and then assesses constraints that prevent the achievement of this objective. Strategic thinking looks at alternative pathways that get around those constraints; if this is not possible, it requires the redirection of energies to other goals that are more realistically achievable [1, 2].

In the current conditions, one of the decisive aspects of the functioning of economic systems (enterprises, industries, economics) is the choice of the areas of development, designed and substantiated at the strategic level within the framework of a certain management entity. The need for the most appropriate and optimal choice of development strategies is actualized through the continuous influence of the environment, which is undergoing more rapid changes in the 21 century, has rather complex manifestations, associated with new globalization, information and communication challenges.

The scientific novelty of the proposed approach is that we take into account the best scientific interpretations regarding this issue, universalize the provisions of contemporary scientific thought in the definite aspect of the study, point out the innovative areas characteristic of the practice of the entities activity in the industry.


development; construction; strategy; approach; classification.

Full Text:



Levy, B. (2007). Governance Reform: Bridging Monitoring and Action. Washington: World Bank. doi:

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53 (1), 69–105. doi:

Pashhenko, O. P. (2012). Teoretychni aspekty stratehichnoho upravlinnya rozvytkom pidpryyemstva. Available at:

Bozhanova, V., Kononova, O. (2018). Formation of socio-economic development strategy of construction enterprises. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 6, 10–18. doi:

Kononova, O.; Pasichnyk, Yu. (Ed.) (2018). Stages of implementing the construction company’s strategies and the applicable scope of strategic changes. Economic and Legal Foundations of the Public Transformations in Conditions of Financial Globalization. New York: Yunona Publishing, 466.

Hruppa kompanyi «MTM-System». Available at:

Starshynova, T. A., Perepelyca, N. M. (2016). O klassyfykacyy stratehyi predpryyatyya. Vestnyk TvHU, 1.

Lennar Completes Strategic Combination with CalAtlantic (2018). Available at:

Lennar Corp. Available at:

Vynychenko, E. N. (2015) Sravnytelnaya kharakterystyka bazovykh stratehyi razvytyya predpryyatyi. Evropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku, 2 (19).

Vykhanskyi, O. S. (2015). Stratehycheskoe upravlenye. Moscow: Ekonomyst, 296.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Oleksandra Kononova, Yuliia Prymush

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2613-5647 (Online), ISSN 2613-5639 (Print)